http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/58939851.html?page=1#comments
I read this entire interview with my jaw hanging open to be honest. Utterly utterly despicable
I read this entire interview with my jaw hanging open to be honest. Utterly utterly despicable
Tags:
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:14 am (UTC)http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2011/05/gossip-girl-is-chuck-bass-abusive-ep-says-no-we-beg-to-differ.html is pure win
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:27 am (UTC)And a lot of the media has actually been pretty positive towards Dan and Blair, so I'm interested in the response (and the ratings...) when the show start pushing Blar back towards Chuck yet again
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:16 am (UTC)I stop watching GG cause there was so much craziness and I promise myself I would only watch again if there was going to be something between Dan/Blair, but neither that helped cause I just can't :/
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:24 am (UTC)The relationship has been abusive for a looong time now, last episode was just the final straw and it's an insult for the writer to focus on the cut was unintentional and "dainty" and Blair doesn't see it as abuse so it's all good. Putting aside that whole assault, the way that Chuck has emotionally abused and degraded Blair for so long now is abusive on its own
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:33 am (UTC)Cause let's face it, who could actually try to pimp her girlfriend to his uncle!!!?
Then as you said, his mission was destroy her, destroy her dreams, everything that she wanted. And now he was telling her that she was "his"?
And writers are actually saying he will never hurt her? I've just saw thir las scene and throw a girl to the couch and just force her, for me it's hurt someone.
But he has done it from a long time, I hope this it's the last season of GG.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 03:02 am (UTC)But then you read the interviews with the writers singing about Blair was not afraid in that scene with Chuck and hey how about that scene of Chair on chairs, and it's just like wtf what show was I watching. Leighton played that moment as terrified, she was ducking from his fist??? How it was supposed to be about her being afraid FOR Chuck just makes no sense with what was portrayed on-screen
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 06:45 pm (UTC)And of course when they were plotting agains Georgina too :P.
How could she not be afraid? if she wasn't she could have stay and talk about it, but instead she run away.
And if she was afraid for Chuck, she would have help to clean his wound or something like that (but again, they would be sending an awful message, cause she will be there helping after he almost hit her).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 07:38 pm (UTC)And she definitely seems afraid to me in this gif. I just don't understand how a writer can come out and say that Chuck would never hurt Blair and that wasn't their intention, so why are they writing it that way???? That scene was not directed as Blair just being worried for Chuck, I don't even know what to say any more
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:36 am (UTC)That it's what scares me most, cause yeah yeah blah blah Blair&Chuck are meant to be, but after this, how could they? it's sending the wrong message, that isn't true love, it isn't love at all!.
Even if Dan/Blair doesn't end up together at least I hope they remain friends cause she needs someone like him in her life.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:34 am (UTC)OK, here's my question:
Josh Safran is clearly, *empirically*, a man who does not recognize rape when he sees it.
Do you think he is a rapist? My guess, as a pure outsider to the fandom, is "he doesn't think so."
But if he isn't, I would bet real money that some guy he's close to is. Safran thinks like an abuser, and either he is one or he's in the habit of talking and spending time with someone who is.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:53 am (UTC)I honestly believed that a textbook abusive relationship was being written with Chuck and Blair this season with set-up for Blair finally finding her happiness with Dan. I did NOT expect a writer to suddenly come out with "we do not believe that it is abuse when it's the two of them" and that Chuck would supposedly never hurt Blair. This season alone he has fallen in love with two other women, whilst snarling at Blair so much as looking at another man, and only comes crawling back to Blair for comfort when his Daddy issues become too much for him. It's disgusting to see him still being idealized as a romantic leading man
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 03:30 am (UTC)WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK?!?!?
So either this supports my mean, nasty theory that Hollywood sexual culture is a cross between that depicted in "Mad Men" and street prostitution (http://mecurtin.dreamwidth.org/60896.html), or Safran is a rapist. Or maybe he just *admires* them.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 04:08 am (UTC)"the consequence of that fight was Blair had the most perfect, beautiful, dainty injury"
I mean wtf is that supposed to even mean when you are talking about a scene of someone smashing glass in a drunken rage??? The romanticizing of abuse in that whole interview is some of the sickest stuff I have read in a while
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 03:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 03:22 am (UTC)I used to ship them tbh, but as a fun power couple. They reminded me a little bit of Kathryn and Sebastian from Cruel Intentions (one of my secret fav ships!), but the way that Chuck treats Blair has just become so degrading in the last two seasons
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 03:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 03:34 am (UTC)telling her she's only his
And he's always talking about Blair like she's his property, it's quite disgusting. But hey apparently it's all good because he has ~rage and we all know that "it is not abuse when it's the two of them"
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 06:42 pm (UTC)YOUR ICOOOOOON! :D
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 07:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 08:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 05:06 am (UTC)(BTW, my favorite part of that ONTD post was two people I don't even know in fandom calling MLV psycho in the comments. I love feeling validated)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 12:43 pm (UTC)(BTW, my favorite part of that ONTD post was two people I don't even know in fandom calling MLV psycho in the comments. I love feeling validated)
Oh she's always trolling GG posts now. Someone said that she doesn't even watch the show when she makes out she ships Chuck and Blair, she just keeps coming into the posts and posting them because one of the Dair posters upset her by trashing Smallville or something :eyeroll:
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 07:19 pm (UTC)I'd recently thought of watching GG with summer coming as so many people on my f-list watch and I trust their judgment, but it sounds like a bad bet if this is how it plays out. That post had pages of comments and all pretty disgusted.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 07:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 06:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 12:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:27 pm (UTC)Also, I noticed in the comments cricketgrl's still trolling around. jesus, some things never change.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:31 pm (UTC)But whatever happens I think (hope!) they are going to have to seriously question their excusing of Chuck at this point. It's really blown up on twitter, and people have now stated contacting the CW and the advertiser's to point out that a GG writer is condoning abuse
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 06:23 pm (UTC)http://jezebel.com/#!5798390/violence-passed-off-as-romance-on-gossip-girl
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 08:07 pm (UTC)I just watch it for the dresses blair is wearing...
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 08:34 pm (UTC)Blair's dress at the pink party was so gorgeous! And I remember the costume designer saying that the episodes in Paris were worth waching for the clothes alone, and so true!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-05 01:31 am (UTC)UGH. Gossip Girl, you used to be my crack filled happy place. I feel like all the writers are taking crazy pills if they don't look at that scene and think it was abusive. I miss the days when Chuck just used to stalk people and try to jump off roofs.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-05 10:44 am (UTC)It's so confusing because for a while now I've suspected they've been trying to kill Chair, and last episode felt like the final nail in the coffin like no way will they have him throw Blair down and scream "you're mine" if they had any plans to reunite them romantically. And then they come out with that, and tell us we should have just been seeing it as a volatile romance
And you mean this from just a few weeks ago
http://www.dvdboxroom.com/news/1490-Gossip-Girl-Chuck-Bass-needs-to-be-redeemed.html
"Redeeming Chuck... that's a term that I've seen on Twitter. There's a big redeem Chuck and Blair and redeem Chuck Bass tweet thing. My thing is, and I know Stephanie believes this and Josh [Schwartz] believes this as well, the drama from shows comes out of characters doing things necessarily that aren't always right," Safran explained. "It was always the thing about "Sex and the City dvd" and Carrie always made mistakes constantly and you understand it because that's what life is. We all make mistakes. No one goes through perfectly. I don't think that Chuck necessarily needs to be redeemed so much as he actually needs to find his way, which is different."
:dies: How are they going to compare him to Carrie from Sex And The City and no one is perfect, IS THIS REAL LIFE????
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-08 06:35 am (UTC)Josh and Co has destroyed Chuck and CB thoroughly. DB has always been my GG AU couple-friendship since season 1 and Dan is good for her vice versa. If anything that article pissed me off more I am sorry but CB need to break up for good because this dragging Blair's characterization down while Chuck's is destroyed permanently. TBH Chuck hasn't been quite the same since after the strike in season 1.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-08 12:43 pm (UTC)It really does feel like they've intentionally been trying to destroy them as a couple, which makes it even more confusing when they write a clear assault scene, and then come out and say it wasn't really an assault at all when it's the two of them. If they didn't want the audience turning on Chuck and Chuck/Blair, it's not like they were being forced to write it that way so I just don't understand what their goal is
I mean the quotes alone tell you what a mess that relationship is for Blair, it killed me when she was telling Serena, "Chuck had brought me into darkness for so long, I forgot what joy felt like". And we're still supposed to be seeing Chair as an acceptable endgame for her???
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-08 05:00 pm (UTC)This. I don't get it either and why would Josh and co tear down the "fan favorite" just to start another couple this late in the seasons. Makes no sense to me either. I realy think Josh and co do drama for the sake of drama because he knows the actors can better than some of the others. Which is stupid.
Agreed. That killed me too I felt so sorry for her. He really put her through hell. At this point I wouldn't want Blair in space with him let alone the same vicinity.
Your Donna icon is awesome! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-09 12:38 pm (UTC)The interview makes me RAGE every time I read it but the reactions at ONTD are so cathartic. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-09 04:27 pm (UTC)http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/tag/gossip%20girl
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-10 05:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-10 07:04 pm (UTC)