Wtf is this???
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20090309/tts-uk-youtube-music-13002c7.html
The move to block British users access to artists' music videos and user-created videos, which feature licensed music, will take effect on Monday evening British time.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20090309/tts-uk-youtube-music-13002c7.html
The move to block British users access to artists' music videos and user-created videos, which feature licensed music, will take effect on Monday evening British time.
Tags:
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 10:58 pm (UTC)So we can't actually watch anything???
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:42 pm (UTC)So much for the free accesible internet. *rolls eyes*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 12:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 01:20 am (UTC)ISPs in countries such as New Zealand are pushing back against "graduated response" policies that would create a three strikes and you're out policy terminating subscribers based on unproven allegations of copyright infringement...Quebecor argues in favour of certain instances of ISPs controlling content, including anti-spam or child pornography blocking. Moreover, it suggests that copyright policies that build upon the graduated response policies in other countries should be added to the list of content controls that benefit society.
The nastiness in this is that all of the smaller ISPs either run on Quebecor's infrastructure or Bell's, and Bell throttles the speed. Bell does this with every ISP that runs on their infrastructure too.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:51 pm (UTC)Wow! That sucks. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 01:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:53 pm (UTC)*seethes*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 01:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-09 11:54 pm (UTC)But, I hate YT anyway, for all that it is, and this is part of the reason why.
I don`t post my Videos at YT, and now I`m reminded why not.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 01:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 12:10 am (UTC)It's been a long standing rule that companies usually pay for commercials and advertisments to promote their products. YouTube is promoting the RIAA's product for NOTHING! The majority of companies in the world would kill for that kind of promotion but no, not the RIAA. They want YouTube to pay them to promote their own artists. I understand copyright and all that but the RIAA couldn't have dreamed up a better advertising tool than YouTube. The RIAA should be kissing Google's feet and begging to have all their artists videos uploaded there.
Instead what do they do? They try to extort as much money as they possibly can from Google until it's just not viable for Google to continue to pay for promoting the artists that are signed to the record labels. It's completely ludicrous. Only the RIAA could possibly be so greedy as to shoot themselves in their own foot and take even more away from their own bottom line.
The most horrible part of this is that now, music fans can no longer go to YouTube to see that new artist they heard about, and that hurts the fan and the artist. If only the artists could sue the damn RIAA for hurting their ability to promote themselves.
I can't wait for the RIAA to fall....
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 06:00 pm (UTC)If people can't stream the songs on YouTube, aren't they more likely to try downloading them instead? And by d/l they're gonna get the actual files to listen too, and be less likely to buy the CDs.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 01:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 06:03 pm (UTC)So far I can still view fan music video's at least *crosses fingers that will continue*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 06:07 pm (UTC)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/10/youtube-blocks-uk-users-f_n_173431.html
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 06:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 12:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-10 08:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 12:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 02:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-12 02:33 am (UTC)