Profile

frelling_tralk: (Default)
frelling_tralk

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819 20212223
24252627282930
31      

Custom Text

Most Popular Tags

(no subject)

Date: 2007-12-16 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] effulgentnida.livejournal.com
I think that article was just poorly written, It didn't say anything like "In the Doctor's eyes she seemed second best, because he was missing Rose" it seemed like Russell was saying she'd never be as good as Rose, the journalist who wrote the article took what he said out of context and added the "second best" part herself, we know Russell is straight for Rose, but It's obvious he loves Martha too, I don't think he'd actually come out and say "oh Rose? so much better than Martha!" and alienate fans like that or do that to Freema. I don't blame the fans or Rusty, like I said the article was poorly written, the writer made it seem like that was what he meant, which I don't think he did, come on this is the Daily Mail, didn't they also say that The Doctor's son was going to take over? (Or was that the sun?) and now they’re saying that the Pompeii episode is one of the “harem” episodes? They’re not exactly reliable, I’m sure Russell read the article and head desked *loves the Rustybucket*
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit